Number roll-call votes in 2009 from which Sen. Brown was absent: 0
Track the voting and cosponsorship records of all members of the Senate and House
|Progressive Action: support for legislation in the promotion of freedom, knowledge and security. Freedom is achieved when constitutional protections are respected and when people are treated with equality under law. Knowledge is pursued through rigorous support for science and education. Security comes from the protection of environmental resources, the strengthening of economic opportunity for people and the preservation of peace from erosion by wasteful, destructive militarism.
Senator Scott Brown's Progressive Action Score: 3
A score of 3 means that Sen. Brown has positively acted to support 3% of a slate of progressive policies in the 111th Congress.
The following are positive progressive actions taken by Senator Brown during the 111th Congress:
In instrumental terms, the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy is a problem, weakening the strained U.S. military by kicking people out with good service records. There is a more formal problem with DADT as well: the policy to discriminate, to kick people out of the military because of their sexual orientation, is a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. At the end of the 111th Congress, the Senate finally voted to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell.
Senator Brown has acted progressively by voting YES to pass this measure.
|There are some bills on the progressive agenda to which Senator Brown has not yet added his support.|
Call Your Senator to urge that he cosponsor these pending bills:
Since the passage of the Defense of Marriage Act in the 1990s, Congress has made it clear that it has no intention of giving same-sex couples the right to marry at the federal level. But some members of Congress have been making efforts to address discrimination against gay and lesbian couples in other regards. S. 1102, also known as the Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act of 2009, would grant same-sex domestic partners of federal workers the same benefits as federal workers' different-sex spouses. For proponents of equality under law in America this is a step forward, if not a step across the finish line.
Read S. 1102, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
To a person only following expressions of popular culture, it might seem that the United States has moved beyond discrimination against gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transexuals. But in the workaday world, it's still legal for people to be fired from their jobs for no other reason than than their choice of whom to love. And a dirty not-so-secret secret of labor unions has been their historical practice of excluding gay and lesbian workers from full participation and leadership.
ENDA, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2009, would make workplace discrimination in hiring and promotions illegal, and would also prohibit discriminatory behavior against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender members of American labor unions. If passed, ENDA would bring the law into the 21st Century along with the majority of Americans who have realized what matters at work is what you do, not who you love.
Read S. 1584, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
S. 1675, the Energy Development Program Implementation Act, cites the Nuclear Nonproliferation Act of 1978. Nuclear Nonproliferation has been used to justify the war in Iraq, but has it been used to promote peaceful development as intended? Under nuclear nonproliferation treaty obligations, the United States is supposed to provide non-nuclear, sustainable energy assistance to developing countries. It has failed in this regard.
Akakaís legislation would change that, directing the Secretary of Energy to correct the neglect. The bill would create an Alternative Energy Corps, made up of American volunteers who agree to go overseas and help set up solar, wind and other forms of sustainable energy in developing countries. This bill addresses poverty, climate change, nuclear proliferation, treaty obligations and international relations through simple, achievable means.
Read S. 1675, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
S. 1686, the JUSTICE Act, is a bill to reform the USA Patriot Act and FISA Amendments Act and restore some constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure by the United States Government.
It's a long bill, but the following are some of its highlights. If passed, S. 1686 would:
- stop bulk collection of all Americans' communications and end reverse targeting of American citizens
- stop the targeting of Americans on the basis of the content of their political speech
- restrict warrantless surveillance programs to suspected terrorists and their direct contacts
- limit the period of time for which a surveillance order may remain in effect
- permit judicial review and court challenges to unreasonable programs of search and seizure
- revoke retroactive immunity for telecommunications corporations that broke the law by releasing your private information
- increase the level of reporting to the Congress and public regarding surveillance programs
The JUSTICE Act is not a perfect bill; it does not wholly shutter the program of national surveillance that contravenes the 4th Amendment guarantee against search or seizure without a specific warrant from a judge. But it does move our nation in the direction of greater respect for our constitution and for civil liberty.
Read S. 1686, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
In the effort to rescue our oceans from chemical and biological disaster, the date is already late. Elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from human activities have already increased the acidity of the oceans to such an extent that animals like shellfish and corals are having a difficult time creating their shells and skeletons. Other ocean animals are experiencing disruptions in their reproductive behavior and general physiological functions as a result of the increased acidity.
UNESCO's Monaco Declaration of scientists following on their meeting for the 2nd International Symposium on the Ocean in a High-CO2 world declares:
"Ocean acidification is accelerating and severe damages are imminent.... Since industrialization began in the 18th century, surface-ocean acidity has increased by 30%. This ongoing ocean acidification is decreasing the ability of many marine organisms to build their shells and skeletal structure. Increasing acidity and related changes in seawater chemistry also affect reproduction, behaviour, and general physiological functions of some marine organisms, such as oysters, sea urchins, and squid."
We donít see clear, boldfaced warnings like these very often, and when we do, we ought to pay attention to them. And as the report points out, an acified ocean is an ocean that decimates the marine life on which a significant portion of the world depends for food and commerce. That makes ocean acidification an economic as well as an environmental issue.
In the Senate, Frank Lautenberg has introduced S.173, the Federal Ocean Acidification Research And Monitoring Act. This legislation would establish and support a regime of empirical research and monitoring of ocean acidification under the auspices of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), with the purpose of developing specific strategies for mitigation of ecological impact.
Read S. 173, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
Our forests are a major source of clean and safe drinking water and a reservoir for biological diversity, as well as being a place for us to get away and experience challenge and solitude. There are many, many acres of federally-owned forest available for logging, with roads already created and maintained for that use. Those areas will remain available for logging into the future so long as they are responsibly maintained. Why not take the roadless areas that are left and keep them that way? Why not set them aside for future and current generations of humans and wild things to use and enjoy?
With this conservationist aim in mind, S. 1738 would set aside those roadless areas within the National Forest System and preserve that roadless status, with exceptions for catastrophes, preservation efforts, or other activities that were specifically provided for under the original mandates of particular National Forest lands.
Read S. 1738, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
Research demonstrates the effectiveness of public Pre-Kindergarten education in improving literacy and mathematics competency among children of a variety of economic and social backgrounds in the short and long term. Early intellectual skill development is crucial in determining the life chances of an individual child, and the potential for accomplishment of a generation of children. Not only to increase individual outcomes but to promote the general welfare, S. 206 would create a series of grants to state governments with the purpose of broadening and enriching Pre-K programs for all children.
Read S. 206, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
The Farallon Islands are an uninhabited group of islands -- uninhabited by humans, that is. The Gulf of the Farallones is a sanctuary for marine birds, is a gathering point for marine mammals, and is host to a wide variety of ocean life due to the shallow depth of the water immediately surrounding it.
In short, the Farallon Island area is a biological treasure. It has value beyond its stark beauty as a biological bank, maintaining fisheries that sustain commerce as well. S. 212 is a bill before the Congress that would expand the boundaries of the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary, not just to protect this area for wildlife, but also to strengthen the long-term security of the Pacific fishing industry.
Read S. 212, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
In the fall of 2009, the United States Department of Labor released a 194-page report identifying countries where "there is a significant incidence of forced labor and/or child labor in production" of various sorts of goods, from toys to textiles. As you can see for yourself, the list of countries with significant labor abuses is long.
If S. 2821 is a bill that would require new international trade agreements to contain conditions requiring partner countries to guarantee the right to form labor associations and collectively bargain, eliminate forced labor, end child labor, and outlaw employment discrimination. If a new trade pact coming through the Congress did not contain such guarantees, a single Senator could object and bring the trade pact to a halt. This bill represents a significant expansion to the scope of our nation's moral gaze.
Read S. 2821, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
The problem with cluster bombs is threefold:
1. When used, they are distributed in large numbers across terrain;
2. They have a high failure rate, leaving many unexploded bombs;
3. They are small and typically shiny, disproportionately attracting the hands of curious children.
Cluster bombs are designed to kill people, not to damage buildings or roads. Like land mines, they continue to kill people long after the battle in which they were used. It is typical for a large number of these smaller bombs to remain undetonated, waiting to explode, after their initial deployment.
The Federation of American Scientists' report on the matter makes clear the danger of cluster munitions: "40 percent of the duds on the ground are hazardous and for each encounter with an unexploded submunition there is a 13 percent probability of detonation. Thus, even though an unexploded submunition is run over, kicked, stepped on, or otherwise disturbed, and did not detonate, it is not safe. Handling the unexploded submunition may eventually result in arming and subsequent detonation."
Cluster bombs kill civilians when they are used. Our government knows this, and yet our government continues to manufacture, use and sell cluster bombs to foreign countries.
The Cluster Munitions Civilian Protection Act of 2009 forbids the United States government from spending money to use, sell or transfer cluster bombs unless the following requirements are met:
- The cluster bombs are proven to have a 1 percent or lower rate of malfunction
- The cluster bombs will not be used against anything but a clearly defined military target, in an area where there are no civilians and in places where civilians do not ordinarily live
- A plan is submitted, with the costs included, for cleaning up all the undetonated explosives that come from cluster bombs, whether they are used by the US military, or by other countries to whom the United States has supplied the cluster bombs
There is a waiver in the law for the first requirement (for the malfunctioning rate of 1 percent or lower), in cases in which it is "vital" to use cluster bombs in order to protect the security of the United States. However, even in such cases, the President is required to submit a report to Congress which explains how civilians will be protected from the cluster bombs, and revealing the failure rate of the cluster bombs, as well as whether the cluster bombs are equipped with self-destruct functions.
The Cluster Munitions Civilian Protection Act is not a perfect bill, but it is a big improvement over the deadly status quo.
Read S. 416, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. Nor shall any State deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. These are the American standards of nondiscrimination, chiseled into our legal bedrock in the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. How seriously do members of Congress take this section of the U.S. Constitution? S. 424 is a test.
S. 424, the Uniting American Families Act, is a bill which aims to put into closer compliance with the U.S. Constitution by removing discrimination according to the status of permanent couples. According to law, same-sex couples in permanent relationships cannot marry; only different-sex couples can. The creates two classes of couple in the United States. They are separate. Are they equal? Not currently. Under current immigration law, married immigrant spouses of citizens and permanent residents have a preferred route toward gaining permanent resident status themselves. Unmarried partners of citizens and permanent residents have this avenue closed to them. That is unequal treatment under law for immigrants under American jurisdiction, and it is an unequal abridgment of legal privilege for the citizens whose permanent partners wish to join them.
Introduced by Senator Patrick Leahy, the Uniting American Families Act would end this status discrimination by amending various the immigration laws that discriminate against same-sex couples when one member of a couple is a citizen or permanent resident and the other is seeking citizenship or residency status.
Read S. 424, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
S. 482, a bill introduced by Senator Russ Feingold, would require senators to file campaign finance reports electronically and for the Secretary of the Senate to forward such reports to the Federal Election Commission within one working day of their receipt. As it stands now, many Senators exploit a special exemption in order to file their campaign finance reports on paper. The practical effect of this is to delay the processing of campaign contribution reports until after an election is over and to make the discovery of unsavory campaign expenditures by reporters and citizens more difficult. Feingold's bill would increase efficiency within the government, increase transparency of information to reporters, and increase the accountability of Senators to American citizens.
Read S. 482, then call Senator Brown at 617-565-3170 and ask him to support it by adding cosponsorship.
|Regressive Action: a pattern of legislative behavior that erodes freedom, knowledge and security. When constitutional protections are disregarded, when discrimination under law is fostered, when the pursuit of knowledge is abandoned and science overruled, when wealth for a few matters more than prosperity for all, and when "Yeehaw" is the most articulate expression of foreign policy, our nation is headed in a direction that is not only morally wrong but self-destructive.
Senator Scott Brown's Regressive Action Score: 23
A score of 23 means that Sen. Brown, through voting and cosponsorship, has pushed forward 23% of a slate of regressive policies in the 111th Congress.
The following are regressive policy actions taken by Senator Brown during the 111th Congress:
Cloture Vote on H.R. 4213
On July 20, 2010 the Senate held a roll-call vote to stop a filibuster and allow unemployment benefits for jobless workers to be extended at a time when Americans are finding it very hard to obtain work. Exteding unemployment insurance coverage for those who have lost their jobs (a YES vote) is a way to keep families sustained in their homes until the economy improves and hiring opens back up. Continuing the filibuster of unemployment insurance coverage (by voting NO) is a way to throw American families and American society into crisis.
Senator Brown voted AGAINST this progressive measure.
The 2010 extension of tax cuts didn't just continue the tax cuts for billionaires and millionaires enacted under George W. Bush. It expanded them, allowing inheritance of estates of up to 10 million dollars tax-free, and deepening special tax favors for investors. The legislation also undermined the integrity of Social Security by creating a new standard of low funding for the Social Security trust fund, exposing Social Security to new charges of being unsustainably funded.
Senator Brown voted YES to pass this regressive measure.
S. 3081, if passed, would grant the U.S. government power to imprison its own citizens without criminal charges, without any trial, at without end. Breaking nearly two hundred years of posse comitatus tradition, this legislation would allow the military to round up and hold Americans without evidence of wrongdoing. The new law would forbid the government from telling detained citizens what their rights are. Designations and determinations that could put Americans in military confinement for the rest of their lives would be made at the discretion of the President and the Secretary of Defense. Juries and judges would be forbidden from participating. Nobody in the government would ever have to prove anything. Far from moderate, this legislation gives a few people in charge of the government immense and unquestionable power over the rest of us.
Senator Brown cosponsored this regressive bill.
Senators like to declare their support for American jobs in speeches, but do they actually support American jobs in their actions? S. 3816, the Creating American Jobs and Ending Offshoring Act, is a bill that if passed would promote the development of American jobs in two ways. First, it would give a 2-year payroll tax cut to businesses every time they hire an American citizen or resident for a job that used to be sourced overseas. Second, it would eliminate tax breaks for the corporate expenses involved in transferring an American job overseas.
Senator Brown voted AGAINST this progressive measure.
S.J. Res 26
On June 10 2010, the extent of Arctic sea ice plummeted to four standard deviations below the 1979-2000 mean. Also on June 10 2010, NASA released data showing that a heat wave in May of 2010 had set new worldwide temperature records for the month.
On the afternoon of June 10 2010, 47 Senators put blinders on, ignored our climate crisis and voted in favor of prohibiting the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases. Fortunately, 53 Senators voted to reject S.J. Res 26.
Senator Brown voted YES to pass this regressive measure.
| ||Contact information for Senator Brown:|
Senate Russell Courtyard 1
Washington DC 20510
(all mail delayed at least 2 weeks)
Web page, contact form
DC Office Phone: 202-224-4543
MA Office Phone: 617-565-3170
Recent legislative news in which Scott Brown plays a part:
Accountability Time from the Tea Party for Scott Brown on Shield Act?
The Tea Party movement buoyed Republican Scott Brown into his Senate office last year, ostensibly on the basis that Scott Brown would be a firm supporter of the Constitution and Freedom. The Greater... [more]
Scott Brown Takes Oil Money At Lobbyist Party
Senator Scott Brown says that he wants to return Washington D.C. to the American people. "I pledged to do my best to change the tone in Washington, and I am committed to fulfilling that pledge. Washington... [more]
Why Did 45 Senators Vote to Reward Job Exports?
The way our economy is set up now, if American corporations really want to ship all their factories and jobs overseas, they can. But should the government reward that behavior? Under the tax code, that's just what the government does today. Corporations today can get tax deductions... [more]
Joe Lieberman and Scott Brown's New Bill to Revoke Americans' Citizenship Without Trial
John McCain's Arbitrary Detention Plan Falters in House and Senate
Last month, Senator John McCain introduced S. 3081, a bill giving the government power to... [more]
3 Senators and 3 Representatives Move to Criminalize Investigative Journalism
Should a journalist who finds out that the CIA has been torturing its detainees, and then writes a newspaper article sharing this information, be sent to prison for 10 years?
Should a journalist who... [more]
Bill Proposes Locking Up Americans Without Criminal Charges
The Constitution is clear about what must happen when a person is accused of a crime: Except if the person is a serving member of the military during... [more]
Who Funds the DNC?
This morning Congressional Quarterly casually mentions that the Democratic National Committee is spending $500,000 on the special... [more]
This resource brought to you by
Other resources include:
Massachusetts political resources
Politics in all 50 states
That's My Congress!
Sweatshop-Free Political T-Shirts
Vote Democratic 2012 Second Term Election Buttons and Bumper Stickers
We frequently update our Liberal and Conservative Ratings for the U.S. Senate as new bills are introduced, members of the House add their cosponsorships to existing bills, and roll call votes occur. Our most recent update occurred on December 20, 2010.