<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>That&#039;s My Congress &#187; privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/tag/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thatsmycongress.com</link>
	<description>A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:13:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Preparing To Extend Electronic Spy Dragnet For Five More Years</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2012/05/24/congress-preparing-to-extend-electronic-spy-dragnet-for-five-more-years/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2012/05/24/congress-preparing-to-extend-electronic-spy-dragnet-for-five-more-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congress Watcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisa amendments act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=6025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FISA Amendments Act was the brainchild of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, but now, President Barack Obama is supporting the 5-year extension of the spying law.  So are many Democrats in the House and Senate.  Any grassroots effort to stop the renewal of the FISA Amendments Act will therefore face a steep uphill battle.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2012/05/24/congress-preparing-to-extend-electronic-spy-dragnet-for-five-more-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Nominates Civil Liberty Board After 3 Year Delay; Responsibility Falls to Patrick Leahy</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2012/01/09/obama-nominations-to-board-patrick-leahy-responsible/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2012/01/09/obama-nominations-to-board-patrick-leahy-responsible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congressional Aid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Senate hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick leahy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=5833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ten reports have gone missing. Under a federal law passed in 2008, President Barack Obama is required to nominate members of a Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB), an independent office in the executive branch of the U.S. Government. Fusion Center administrators and information sharing specialists are required by law to take civil liberties [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2012/01/09/obama-nominations-to-board-patrick-leahy-responsible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Surveillance Bill Approved By House Judiciary Committee</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2011/07/29/online-surveillance-bill-approved-by-house-judiciary-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2011/07/29/online-surveillance-bill-approved-by-house-judiciary-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congress Watcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Goodlatte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Lungren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darrell issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dennis Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elton Gallegly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hank johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Berman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Coble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Sensenbrenner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Chaffetz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerrold nadler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Conyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamar Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxine Waters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mel watt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike quigley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedro pierluisi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[randy forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandy adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheila Jackson-Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve chabot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ted deutch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Marino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim griffin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trey gowdy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zoe Lofgren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=5383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[H.R. 1981 would require the linkage of all our online activities to our names and other personal information.  This, in turn, would enable government intelligence agents to search through its massive databases of online activities, collected under the FISA Amendments Act, by citizen name, address or telephone number.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2011/07/29/online-surveillance-bill-approved-by-house-judiciary-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Stooges: Baca Fortenberry and Deutch Insist on Privacy for Themselves But not for You</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2011/05/23/three-stooges-baca-fortenberry-and-deutch-insist-on-privacy-for-themselves-but-not-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2011/05/23/three-stooges-baca-fortenberry-and-deutch-insist-on-privacy-for-themselves-but-not-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 22:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congressional Aid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[House legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addresses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elitist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h.r. 423]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h.r. 514]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeff fortenberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Baca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriot act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stooge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ted deutch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=5170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The four cosponsors of H.R. 423, a bill to keep the addresses of members of Congress private: Joe Baca (Democrat-CA District 43)Ted Deutch (Democrat-FL District 19)Jeff Fortenberry (Republican-NE District 1)Jared Polis (Democrat-CO District 2) Of these four, those which voted YES on H.R. 514, a bill to reauthorize the Patriot Act and revoke the privacy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2011/05/23/three-stooges-baca-fortenberry-and-deutch-insist-on-privacy-for-themselves-but-not-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Duncan Links Airport Scanners And Corruption</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/11/19/john-duncan-links-airport-scanners-and-corruption/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/11/19/john-duncan-links-airport-scanners-and-corruption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congress Watcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael chertoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapiscan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=4420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a speech before the House of Representatives this week, John Duncan pointed out that there are indications of corruption in the process of selecting companies to produce and install full body scanners for airport security lines.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/11/19/john-duncan-links-airport-scanners-and-corruption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thad McCotter Pushes for the Right Not to Be Talked About on the Web</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/04/29/thad-mccotter-pushes-for-the-right-not-to-be-talked-about-on-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/04/29/thad-mccotter-pushes-for-the-right-not-to-be-talked-about-on-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congressional Aid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[House legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber privacy act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h.r. 5108]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thad mccotter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=3423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having previously introduced a bill creating a tax incentive for dogs&#8217; luxury spa treatments, Rep. Thaddeus McCotter of Michigan has gained a reputation for creative legislation. This week, Rep. McCotter maintains his reputation with the introduction of H.R. 5108, the Cyber Privacy Act. The following is the full text of the Cyber Privacy Act: A [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/04/29/thad-mccotter-pushes-for-the-right-not-to-be-talked-about-on-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Democrats Sneak Through Patriot Act Vote</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/02/26/house-democrats-sneak-through-patriot-act-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/02/26/house-democrats-sneak-through-patriot-act-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congress Watcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hidden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriot act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roll call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spying surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=3019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, 315 members, 162 Democrats and 153 Republicans, voted in favor of extending the Patriot Act without any reforms.  Read the names in a roll call vote.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/02/26/house-democrats-sneak-through-patriot-act-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Data Privacy Day Resolution A Nasty Joke</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/01/30/national-data-privacy-day-resolution-a-nasty-joke/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/01/30/national-data-privacy-day-resolution-a-nasty-joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congress Watcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisa amendments act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriot act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search and seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=2817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the face of the Senate's repeated on-the-record votes against data privacy, it's an outrageous hypocrisy for senators to vote for a resolution that suggests the observance of National Data Privacy Day - a day after the actual event is over.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/01/30/national-data-privacy-day-resolution-a-nasty-joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Martha Coakley Still Doesn&#8217;t Get It On The Patriot Act</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/01/martha-coakley-still-doesnt-get-it-on-the-patriot-act/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/01/martha-coakley-still-doesnt-get-it-on-the-patriot-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congress Watcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martha coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Capuano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nextel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriot act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=2278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether Martha Coakley is truly clueless about the Patriot Act, or is using the illusion of ignorance to cover for a seething hatred of the constitutional rights of Americans under the Fourth Amendment, she is clearly the wrong choice to succeed Edward Kennedy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/01/martha-coakley-still-doesnt-get-it-on-the-patriot-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transcript: Gregory T. Nojeim Testimony on Cybersecurity and Privacy to the Senate Judiciary Committee</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/11/17/transcript-gregory-nojeim-on-cybersecurit/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/11/17/transcript-gregory-nojeim-on-cybersecurit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congressional Aid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Senate hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greg nojeim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiretap act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=2150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is our transcription of remarks made today by Greg Nojeim, Senior Counsel of the Center for Democracy and Technology, in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security. Thank you for the opportunity to testify about cybersecurity and civil liberties on behalf of the Center for Democracy and Technology. CDT [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/11/17/transcript-gregory-nojeim-on-cybersecurit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

