<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>That&#039;s My Congress &#187; checks and balances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/tag/checks-and-balances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thatsmycongress.com</link>
	<description>A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:13:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Roll Call: 88 Tea Party members of Congress vote for Unrestrained War Powers</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2011/06/03/62-percent-of-tea-party-in-congress-votes-for-unrestrained-war-powers/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2011/06/03/62-percent-of-tea-party-in-congress-votes-for-unrestrained-war-powers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congressional Aid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[House legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[112th congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checks and balances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h.con.res. 51]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roll call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war powers act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=5207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party movement and the national organizations claiming to represent it have repeatedly asserted the importance of limited government. A number of politicians were elected to Congress in 2010 by surfing atop the wave of Tea Party cries to protect the Constitution. Today, the commitment of those politicians to limited constitutional government was put [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2011/06/03/62-percent-of-tea-party-in-congress-votes-for-unrestrained-war-powers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton Refuses To Commit To The Constitution</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2008/07/06/hillary-clinton-refuses-to-commit-to-the-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2008/07/06/hillary-clinton-refuses-to-commit-to-the-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Congress Watcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Senate legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charles schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checks and balances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clintonnewyork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ex post facto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisa amendments act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillary clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schumernewyork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FISA Amendments Act is profoundly, thoroughly unconstitutional and anticonstitutional.  It makes the fourth amendment in the Bill of Rights irrelevant, completely ignores the ban on ex post facto laws, slams the concept of equal protection under the law, and generally wrecks the system of checks and balances between what are supposed to be three coequal branches of government.  So, why won't Hillary Clinton declare her opposition to this terrible law?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2008/07/06/hillary-clinton-refuses-to-commit-to-the-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

