The Ideology Of Democrats Who Voted To Hold Eric Holder In Contempt

There was a reasonable, liberal rationale for Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives to vote in favor of the Republican-led resolution to cite Attorney General Eric Holder as in contempt of Congress. Eric Holder is attempting to thwart the oversight powers of Congress by refusing to turn over documents requested by Congress. Barack Obama has followed in the footsteps of George W. Bush by asserting the constitutionally-unjustified power of Executive Privilege to ignore oversight by Congress. These are the kinds of seizures of power that Democrats opposed, when they were committed by George W. Bush.

On the other hand, there was the opportunity for political advantage for some Democrats voting in favor of holding Eric Holder in contempt. Democrats in right-leaning districts could use the vote as an opportunity to distance themselves from the Obama Administration.

Seventeen House Democrats voted in favor of the contempt citation of Eric Holder today. Were they holding true to solid liberal ideology, defying their own political party to do so, or were they simply Blue Dogs, helping the Republican agenda as they usually do?

Let’s look at the data, using our Legislative scorecard for the current session of the House of Representatives. The following is a scatterplot of the 17 Democrats who voted to hold Eric Holder in contempt of Congress. Each point represents one of the Democrats voting for the contempt measure.

legislative ideology chart

In this chart, Democrats who vote for right wing legislation more often than they vote for left wing legislation are in the red half. Democrats who vote more for left wing legislation than for right wing legislation are in the blue half. As can be seen, most of the House Democrats who voted for the Eric Holder contempt citation are in the red half (11 out of the 17). Even those pro-contempt Democrats who are in the blue half of the chart are not strongly so. None of the more liberal members of the U.S. House voted in favor of contempt today. It seems that political opportunism, not liberal ideology, was the motivation for the anti-Holder Democratic vote. All of these 17 Democrats are on the right wing of the Democratic Party.

The names of the pro-contempt Democrats: Jason Altmire, John Barrow, Dan Boren, Leonard Boswell, Ben Chandler, Mark Critz, Joe Donnelly, Kathy Hochul, Ron Kind, Larry Kissell, Jim Matheson, Mike McIntyre, Bill Owens, Collin Peterson, Nick Joe Rahall, Mike Ross, Tim Walz.

One Comment

on “The Ideology Of Democrats Who Voted To Hold Eric Holder In Contempt
One Comment on “The Ideology Of Democrats Who Voted To Hold Eric Holder In Contempt
  1. Att. General Eric Holder should resign, if not, then fired. President Obama was wrong to protect by executive order Att. Gen. Holder from the Congressional hearing on Operation Fast and Furious. This was a most ill conceived and illegal program held by the DOJ office. Illegal weapons sold as well as given to drug dealers as well as criminals outside of the U.S. Mexico was not informed of this plan where many of the weapons ended up in Mexico, with many Mexican citizens were murdered by the Drug Cartel, with some of the known weapons given or sold to them, as well as one of our own Border Agents killed by the weapons and the newly discovered additional weapons that started with Operation Fast and Furious. Att. Gen. Holder did not cooporate with the Mexicsn authorites in the investigation when they learned of Operation Fast and Furious.
    Att. Gen. Holder also perjured himself by denying he had anything to do with the Investigation of news reporter Steven Risen when in questioning as his signature was on the document for investigation by his office. Att. Gen. Holder should have stopped NSA’s illegal gathering/surveillance of U.S. Citizens phone and data records which was an over-reach and a direct violation of the 4th Admendment of the Constitution as the warrent/writ must be individually served, not a General Warrent, which also must be specific of the charges. This is by far the worse as Att. Gen. Holder has violated his Oath of Office, just as any Senator or Representative who okayed or did not stop the NSA is in violation of their Oath of Office to protect, preserve and uphold the Constituion of the United States.
    Therefore, Congress should require President Obama to force Att. Gen. Holder to resign or fire him if he will not. For that matter, President Obama should be impeached as he also violated his Oath of Office by not stopping NSA, as well as his lie and attempt at cover-up of the Benghazi attack on 9/11/2012. Our Government needs to get back on the right track, get back to upholding the Constitution of the United States.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>