<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wasteful Pentagon Program Supported By Nearly Half of House Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/05/29/wasteful-pentagon-program-supported-by-nearly-half-of-house-democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/05/29/wasteful-pentagon-program-supported-by-nearly-half-of-house-democrats/</link>
	<description>A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 01:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Arcuri Won&#8217;t Support Fiscally Conservative Bill</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/05/29/wasteful-pentagon-program-supported-by-nearly-half-of-house-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-40198</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Arcuri Won&#8217;t Support Fiscally Conservative Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 06:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=3578#comment-40198</guid>
		<description>[...] to Congress. So long as the Pentagon cuts its most outrageous pork barrel spending &#8211; such as money just approved for a second engine for the F-35, a single engine airplane &#8211; this requirement shouldn&#8217;t be a problem. The U.S. military budget is so filled with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Congress. So long as the Pentagon cuts its most outrageous pork barrel spending &#8211; such as money just approved for a second engine for the F-35, a single engine airplane &#8211; this requirement shouldn&#8217;t be a problem. The U.S. military budget is so filled with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irregular Times &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Americans Want A Smaller Military Says GOP Web Site</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2010/05/29/wasteful-pentagon-program-supported-by-nearly-half-of-house-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-40197</link>
		<dc:creator>Irregular Times &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Americans Want A Smaller Military Says GOP Web Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 00:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=3578#comment-40197</guid>
		<description>[...] military itself says that it doesn&#8217;t want or need the projects. Last week, for example, about two-thirds of the Republicans in the House of Representatives voted for a program to develop a secon.... Rolls-Royce and General Electric would profit from the busywork spending, so most of the GOP in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] military itself says that it doesn&#8217;t want or need the projects. Last week, for example, about two-thirds of the Republicans in the House of Representatives voted for a program to develop a secon&#8230;. Rolls-Royce and General Electric would profit from the busywork spending, so most of the GOP in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

