capitol hill dome open
That's My Congress
A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.
  • Home
  • Special Topics
  • Contact
  • Card Game

Thad McCotter Pushes for the Right Not to Be Talked About on the Web

Posted on April 29 2010 by Congressional Aid

Having previously introduced a bill creating a tax incentive for dogs’ luxury spa treatments, Rep. Thaddeus McCotter of Michigan has gained a reputation for creative legislation. This week, Rep. McCotter maintains his reputation with the introduction of H.R. 5108, the Cyber Privacy Act.

The following is the full text of the Cyber Privacy Act:

A BILL
To require certain Internet websites that contain personal information of individual’s to remove such information at the request of such individuals.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Cyber Privacy Act’.
SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF PERSONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OF CERTAIN WEBSITES.

(a) In General- Any Internet website that makes available to the public personal information of individuals shall–
(1) provide, in a clear and conspicuous location on the Internet website, a means for individuals whose personal information it contains to request the removal of such information; and
(2) promptly remove the personal information of any individual who requests its removal.
(b) Definition of Personal Information- As used in this Act, the term ‘personal information’ means any information about an individual that includes, at minimum, the individual’s name together with either a telephone number of such individual or an address of such individual.

SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT BY THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

(a) Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices- A violation of this Act shall be treated as an unfair and deceptive act or practice in violation of a regulation under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)) regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
(b) Powers of Commission- The Federal Trade Commission shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act. Any person who violates such regulations shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in that Act.

Did you get that? Any website that posts “personal information” must make clear how such “personal information” can be removed. And if any person requests the removal of his or her “personal information,” the website must promptly do so.

What is “personal information,” according to Thad McCotter? Well, isn’t it obvious? It’s “information about an individual”. At a minimum, such information includes a person’s name, telephone number and address. At a maximum… well, the bill sets no maximum, leaving “personal information” to simply be “information about an individual.”

If passed and signed by the president, the Cyber Privacy Act would be quite an impactful law. For instance, you’re reading a website right now called That’s My Congress. It contains personal information — “information about an individual” — on many of its pages. Take this very web page you’re reading right now. Why, it contains “information about an individual” named Thad McCotter. If the Cyber Privacy Act passes, then if Thad McCotter wants me to stop telling you about his sponsorship of the act, I’ll have to redact his name. You won’t know who wrote the law that keeps you from knowing who wrote the law. Wrap your head around that.

There’s more. Consider the website fec.gov, operated by the Federal Election Commission. It contains personal information about people who give money to political candidates. If H.R. 5108 passes, then any contributor who doesn’t want you to know about the pattern of his or her monetary contributions to candidates will simply have such personal information removed — Shazam! — after making a request to the government. No more pesky accountability.

Records for contractors with the federal government? Promptly redacted upon request.
Records of criminal convictions? Promptly redacted upon request.
Names and contact information for officeholders? Promptly redacted upon request.
Voting records of members of Congress? Promptly redacted upon request.
Embarrassing information regarding the conduct of any public figure? Promptly redacted upon request.

If passed into law, the Cyber Privacy Act would allow public figures everywhere to scrub information about them, removing all the dirt and leaving only the shine. How would we know anything about the activity of our politicians and other public figures? One possibility remains: euphemism. Nicknames, after all, are not strictly speaking personal information — “information about a person” — but rather fictional, pretend appellations. We could use nicknames to refer to the conduct of our politicians in protected, coded language.

If, a year from now, you find That’s My Congress referring to the legislative actions of Rep. Poochie McTaxBreak, then you’ll know what became of this bill.

Tags: censorship, cyber, cyber privacy act, h.r. 5108, information, internet, personal, privacy, thad mccotter, websites

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Doc Hastings Takes Oil Money After 11 Killed
Bill Owens Proposes Taking Out National Debt to Pay Off National Debt
  • red congress banner
  • Recent Comments

    • Beverly & Fred Braun on Congress Votes To Drag USA Back To Religious Unity
    • Congressional Aid on Capitol Hill Conference Promises Open Legislative Data. Will it Deliver?
    • Linda on Contact
    • martin on Nationwide Protests Against Arbitrary Imprisonment Powers of The NDAA
  • RSS Legislative News

    • H.R. 3745, Putting All of a Credit Union’s Eggs in the Collection Basket
    • Have You Forgotten Obama’s Broken Promise On Corporate Immunity From Prosecution?
    • Jill Stein and Rocky Anderson Take Different Approaches To Opposing SOPA
    • Barack Obama Approves Law Subjecting Americans To Imprisonment Without Criminal Trial
    • Americans Organizing Recalls Of Senators Who Voted For Imprisonment Without Criminal Trial
    • Which of 3 Caucuses (Tea Party, Constitution, Progressive) Most Opposes Indefinite Detention in the USA?
  • Legislative Scorecards

    112th Congress of 2011-2012:

    Senate Scorecard

    House Scorecard



    Historical Records
    111th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    110th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    109th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate

  • This Week In Congress Newsletter

    Receive our This Week in Congress Newsletter by e-mail:



    Our Privacy Commitment: We will not sell or give your e-mail address to any other person or company. We will only send you our This Week in Congress Newsletter, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Recent Posts

    • In Move to Hold Back the K Street Gravy Train 1 Year, Michael Fitzpatrick Stands Alone
    • Spencer Bachus: Using the Levers of Power to Hurt Poor People, Pulling those Levers to Help Himself
    • Mike Honda Celebrates Ruling Against Prop 8
    • Cecil Bothwell Gains Momentum With Heath Shuler Bowing Out
    • Nationwide Protests Against Arbitrary Imprisonment Powers of The NDAA
    • Capitol Hill Conference Promises Open Legislative Data. Will it Deliver?
    • Peter Stark To Address Reason Rally
    • Will Environmental Issues Tip Florida Democratic Race To Patrick Murphy?
  • Search For Legislation

     

     
  • Tags

    afghanistan barack obama california campaign finance christianity climate change congress constitution cosponsorship deepwater horizon democrats dennis kucinich economy energy environment equality fisa amendments act florida global warming Green Party gulf of mexico health care house house of representatives lgbt lobbyists marriage military new york obama oceans offshore drilling oil oil spill patriot act pollution religion republicans senate separation of church and state spending spying surveillance taxes war
  • Categories

    • Activism
    • All Articles
    • campaign gear
    • caucuses
    • Ethics
    • Events
    • Featured
    • House campaigns
    • House hearings
    • House legislation
    • Ideas
    • Links
    • Personalities
    • Podcasts
    • Power Plays
    • questions
    • Senate campaigns
    • Senate hearings
    • Senate legislation
    • Site News
  • Older Articles

  • Newsfeeds

    RSSTMC Articles
    RSSComments
    RSS5 Most Liberal Senators
    RSS5 Most Conservative Senators
    RSS5 Most Liberal Representatives
    RSS5 Most Conservative Representatives

  • Archives

    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • August 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006

Admin


Log in

Copyright © 2012 That's My Congress - Wordpress Theme developed by Web Hosting Fan