<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Betty Sutton Challenged By Right Wing Democrat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/08/betty-sutton-challenged-by-right-wing-democrat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/08/betty-sutton-challenged-by-right-wing-democrat/</link>
	<description>A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick554</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/08/betty-sutton-challenged-by-right-wing-democrat/comment-page-1/#comment-38239</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick554</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=2326#comment-38239</guid>
		<description>Justin is just another Dem masscarading as a Repub to win an election. Sorry Justin, you and Betty will find it wont help ya in 2010. You betcha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin is just another Dem masscarading as a Repub to win an election. Sorry Justin, you and Betty will find it wont help ya in 2010. You betcha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/08/betty-sutton-challenged-by-right-wing-democrat/comment-page-1/#comment-38215</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=2326#comment-38215</guid>
		<description>I would like to point out several issues I have with your article. 

#1 I am not a complete &quot;laissez faire&quot; believer. I have no problem with regulation. I have a real problem with 134,000 pages of regulations. 

#2 The 17th amendment cut away one of the most basic protections of the constitution. We already have a method of directly electing legislators. They are called Representatives. Don&#039;t you think it&#039;s silly to have to legislative bodies that are selected using the same method?

#3 Yes I was sarcastic about the Sierra Club. I have rarely found anyone in the major environmental groups that is the least bit reasonable. You can not compromise with them. It&#039;s either no progress or no progress. No development. Nothing. Even those that were buying into alternative energy are starting to get frustrated, because the environmentalists are fighting them too! 

#3 Frequent oil spills in Artic Drilling. Really? I would love to hear your sources on that and the amound that is spilled. You do of course realize that the earth does quite a bit of &quot;oil slicking&quot; quite naturally did you not?

#4 I am in favor of making abortions illegal. I am not for forcing it down peoples throats however. This is still such a divisive issue, that legislation can not at this time be approached. I also state on the website that even being a pro-life Democrat, I believe that the real problem isn&#039;t the government in this respect. Government only reflects society in the abortion debate. I think it is the duty of every pro-lifer to get out and communicate and try to redevelop a respect for human life in our society.

#5 The constitutions standards of justice do not extend to foreign combatants, taken on a military battlefield. They were not mirandized, neither should they have been. The &quot;crime scene&quot; was not processed, which would have been impossible. The right of open discovery in our court system is not conducive to military operations. 

#6 I don&#039;t believe their needs to be less oversite in the financial markets. I don&#039;t even know where you came up with that one. Actually I am for radically cutting back on the regulation and then agressively enforcing the common sense regulation we leave in place. What happened with the financial markets wasn&#039;t due to not enough regulation. The regulation was there. Unfortuantely people in power circumvented those regulations to benefit their own pockets and friends. You seem to skip the whole discussion I had on our own Democrats being in bed with most of these financial organizations that went under. 

#7 Traditional Democrat. Wow. Comparing me to supporters of slavery and segregation? That was a little low, don&#039;t you think? I&#039;ve lived in the projects. Have you? Have our political leaders? Probably not. 

Finally, I would like you to keep something in mind. Saying you are for something is much different than being for something. A lot of our Democrat leadership have proclaimed they are pro-labor. We&#039;ve shed union jobs for generations. They&#039;ve said they support the black community. How much have we truly helped them? 

Respectfully,

Justin Wooden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to point out several issues I have with your article. </p>
<p>#1 I am not a complete &#8220;laissez faire&#8221; believer. I have no problem with regulation. I have a real problem with 134,000 pages of regulations. </p>
<p>#2 The 17th amendment cut away one of the most basic protections of the constitution. We already have a method of directly electing legislators. They are called Representatives. Don&#8217;t you think it&#8217;s silly to have to legislative bodies that are selected using the same method?</p>
<p>#3 Yes I was sarcastic about the Sierra Club. I have rarely found anyone in the major environmental groups that is the least bit reasonable. You can not compromise with them. It&#8217;s either no progress or no progress. No development. Nothing. Even those that were buying into alternative energy are starting to get frustrated, because the environmentalists are fighting them too! </p>
<p>#3 Frequent oil spills in Artic Drilling. Really? I would love to hear your sources on that and the amound that is spilled. You do of course realize that the earth does quite a bit of &#8220;oil slicking&#8221; quite naturally did you not?</p>
<p>#4 I am in favor of making abortions illegal. I am not for forcing it down peoples throats however. This is still such a divisive issue, that legislation can not at this time be approached. I also state on the website that even being a pro-life Democrat, I believe that the real problem isn&#8217;t the government in this respect. Government only reflects society in the abortion debate. I think it is the duty of every pro-lifer to get out and communicate and try to redevelop a respect for human life in our society.</p>
<p>#5 The constitutions standards of justice do not extend to foreign combatants, taken on a military battlefield. They were not mirandized, neither should they have been. The &#8220;crime scene&#8221; was not processed, which would have been impossible. The right of open discovery in our court system is not conducive to military operations. </p>
<p>#6 I don&#8217;t believe their needs to be less oversite in the financial markets. I don&#8217;t even know where you came up with that one. Actually I am for radically cutting back on the regulation and then agressively enforcing the common sense regulation we leave in place. What happened with the financial markets wasn&#8217;t due to not enough regulation. The regulation was there. Unfortuantely people in power circumvented those regulations to benefit their own pockets and friends. You seem to skip the whole discussion I had on our own Democrats being in bed with most of these financial organizations that went under. </p>
<p>#7 Traditional Democrat. Wow. Comparing me to supporters of slavery and segregation? That was a little low, don&#8217;t you think? I&#8217;ve lived in the projects. Have you? Have our political leaders? Probably not. </p>
<p>Finally, I would like you to keep something in mind. Saying you are for something is much different than being for something. A lot of our Democrat leadership have proclaimed they are pro-labor. We&#8217;ve shed union jobs for generations. They&#8217;ve said they support the black community. How much have we truly helped them? </p>
<p>Respectfully,</p>
<p>Justin Wooden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

