http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/01/martha-coakley-still-doesnt-get-it-on-the-patriot-act/ A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:46:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/01/martha-coakley-still-doesnt-get-it-on-the-patriot-act/comment-page-1/#comment-38096 That’s My Congress » Did Massachusetts Democrat Embrace The Patriot Act? Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:03:52 +0000 http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=2278#comment-38096 [...] Coakley victory is disturbing to supporters of the Constitution, because Coakley has repeatedly spoken in defense of the massive government spying against Americans that’s taking place under the Patriot Act, even though the great majority [...] [...] Coakley victory is disturbing to supporters of the Constitution, because Coakley has repeatedly spoken in defense of the massive government spying against Americans that’s taking place under the Patriot Act, even though the great majority [...]

]]> http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/01/martha-coakley-still-doesnt-get-it-on-the-patriot-act/comment-page-1/#comment-38064 Christine Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:22:09 +0000 http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=2278#comment-38064 I would not vote for Martha Coakley if my life depended on it. Her office practices unfairly as attorney general of our state. I watched her take out my friend's good business because her office wanted to interpret the law one way, when the language of the particular law pertaining to the company could have been interpreted another. She had no regard for this woman's family and that she started this business on her own, and helped so many people because of it. She talks on her commercial about unfair business practices, and she practices them herself. She is not out for our best interest and tries to say she's out to protect us. It's a lie, and I don't trust her. What's even worse, my friend's business involved a business partner, who walked away when the attorney general began her investigation. That business partner is not being charged or pursued, and even more unfair, has opened the same company that Martha Coakley forced my friend to close. She won't be getting my vote. I would not vote for Martha Coakley if my life depended on it. Her office practices unfairly as attorney general of our state. I watched her take out my friend’s good business because her office wanted to interpret the law one way, when the language of the particular law pertaining to the company could have been interpreted another. She had no regard for this woman’s family and that she started this business on her own, and helped so many people because of it. She talks on her commercial about unfair business practices, and she practices them herself. She is not out for our best interest and tries to say she’s out to protect us. It’s a lie, and I don’t trust her. What’s even worse, my friend’s business involved a business partner, who walked away when the attorney general began her investigation. That business partner is not being charged or pursued, and even more unfair, has opened the same company that Martha Coakley forced my friend to close. She won’t be getting my vote.

]]> http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/01/martha-coakley-still-doesnt-get-it-on-the-patriot-act/comment-page-1/#comment-38056 If You Oppose the Patriot Act, Don’t Vote for Martha Coakley – Progressive Bumper Sticker Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:36:22 +0000 http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=2278#comment-38056 [...] a December 1, 2009 debate, Massachusetts Senate candidate Martha Coakley declared that the Patriot Act was all about [...] [...] a December 1, 2009 debate, Massachusetts Senate candidate Martha Coakley declared that the Patriot Act was all about [...]

]]> http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2009/12/01/martha-coakley-still-doesnt-get-it-on-the-patriot-act/comment-page-1/#comment-38054 Irregular Times: News Unfit for Print » Blog Archive » Coakley Reaffirms Support For Patriot Act Spying Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:55:53 +0000 http://thatsmycongress.com/?p=2278#comment-38054 [...] Coakley claimed that “The Patriot Act is about keeping people safe without violating civil rights,” in spite of all the evidence given during October’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing showing that the Patriot Act is neither about keeping people safe, nor refraining from violating civil rights. [...] [...] Coakley claimed that “The Patriot Act is about keeping people safe without violating civil rights,” in spite of all the evidence given during October’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing showing that the Patriot Act is neither about keeping people safe, nor refraining from violating civil rights. [...]

]]>