capitol hill dome open
That's My Congress
A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.
  • Home
  • Special Topics
  • Contact
  • Card Game

Kanjorski and Murtha To Face Progressive Democratic Challengers?

Posted on November 18 2009 by Congress Watcher

In Pennsylvania, two Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives are facing challengers from within their own party, candidates they will need to compete against in the April 2010 Democratic primary even before they have the right to defend themselves from Republican opponents? Why are there Democratic challengers to incumbent members of Congress in these two districts?

paul kanjorskiOne thing the incumbents, Paul Kanjorski and John Murtha, share in common is the rightward tilt of their voting records in Congress. Representative Murtha has earned only a net score of 15 out of a possible 100 progressive points so far in the current session of Congress. Representative Kanjorski’s legislative score is even lower, at just 12 out of 100.

Specifically, both Kanjorski and Murtha voted in favor of an amendment to the health care reform bill that would block many women from getting full family planning insurance coverage, even if they paid for their health insurance completely on their own, without any government assistance. That anti-choice vote has many Democratic activists particularly upset.

On the other hand, political ideology may have nothing to do with the challenges to Murtha and Kanjorski. Another trait that the two incumbents share is that they are rather elderly, near the ends of their careers. It may be that young Democrats merely see an opportunity to challenge politicians who are past their primes.

The challengers have done very little so far to distinguish themselves from the incumbents, when it comes to the issues. Kanjorski’s challenger, Corey O’Brien, has only released the following vague set of bullet points as a kind of first draft policy statement:

* Create High Paying, Family-Sustaining Jobs
* Ensure Access to Affordable, High-Quality Health Care
* Strengthen Education as the Foundation for Economic Prosperity
* Renew Confidence in Our Leaders
* Restore Fiscal Discipline and Require Pay-as-You-Go
* Focus on Energy Conservation & Energy Independence
* Rebuild Our Information and Technology Infrastructure
* Support Our Troops & Veterans

These bullet points are ambiguous enough to cover a broad range of potential issue positions, ranging from right wing to progressive.

Ryan Bucchianeri, the challenger to John Murtha, is even less revealing about his political agenda. His issues page has no content at all at this point, suggesting that Bucchianeri decided to run for Congress before deciding upon his political platform.

Both challengers make thinly-veiled references to the advanced age of the incumbents. Bucchianeri promises to be “a new voice”, while Corey O’Brien pledges to “replace old-style politics with new-style leadership”.

Kanjorski and Murtha have poor records, usually failing to support progressive legislation in the House of Representatives, but Democratic voters in their districts would do well to hold back from supporting O’Brien and Bucchianeri until they are able to articulate specific, progressive alternatives.

Tags: corey obrien, democrats, John Murtha, paul kanjorski, pennsylvania, primary, Ryan Bucchianeri

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Dana Rohrabacher Stands Against Afghan War Escalation
Langevin Gets Pro-Choice Challenger
  • red congress banner
  • Recent Comments

    • R. C. Jackman on Roll Call: 88 Tea Party members of Congress vote for Unrestrained War Powers
    • Richard Page on Jones and Cleaver Try To Convert Churches Into Political Tools
    • Viv Szabo on Status of the Equal Rights Amendment
    • James on Fact Check: Do 70 Members of Congress Belong to Socialist Party of America Caucus?
  • RSS Legislative News

    • Barack Obama Supports Big Brother Spying Powers Against Americans. Do You?
    • 5 Year Extension Of Warrantless Surveillance On Americans Advanced By Secret Senate Hearing
    • Beloved Defender of the Constitution Ron Paul Just Voted Against the Constitution Again
    • New Sanctions Against Iran Smelling Very Oily
    • 77 Democrats Sacrifice Medicare To Protect Military Spending
    • Dozen Democrats Join House GOP To Demolish Nuclear Nonproliferation
  • Legislative Scorecards

    112th Congress of 2011-2012:

    Senate Scorecard

    House Scorecard



    Historical Records
    111th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    110th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    109th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate

  • This Week In Congress Newsletter

    Receive our This Week in Congress Newsletter by e-mail:



    Our Privacy Commitment: We will not sell or give your e-mail address to any other person or company. We will only send you our This Week in Congress Newsletter, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Recent Posts

    • Congress Preparing To Extend Electronic Spy Dragnet For Five More Years
    • Arkansas Liberals Find An Alternative To Blue Dog Democrats
    • Does Super PAC Pay Aguilar Family Member’s Salary on Ground Campaign?
    • Connie Mack Lunches With A Lobbyist
    • 79 House Democrats Vote To Keep Afghanistan War Going On Even Longer
    • Silly Season And Serious Season In The U.S. House
    • Michael Grimm Taking Money In Private Cigar Club Tonight
    • Terrorists and Heart Disease: Who in Congress Focuses on the Real Harm?
  • Search For Legislation

     

     
  • Tags

    afghanistan barack obama blue dogs california campaign finance christianity climate change congress constitution cosponsorship deepwater horizon democrats dennis kucinich economy energy environment equality fisa amendments act florida global warming Green Party gulf of mexico health care house house of representatives lgbt lobbyists marriage military new york obama offshore drilling oil oil spill patriot act pollution religion republicans senate separation of church and state spending spying surveillance taxes war
  • Categories

    • Activism
    • All Articles
    • campaign gear
    • caucuses
    • Ethics
    • Events
    • Featured
    • House campaigns
    • House hearings
    • House legislation
    • Ideas
    • Links
    • Personalities
    • Podcasts
    • Power Plays
    • questions
    • Senate campaigns
    • Senate hearings
    • Senate legislation
    • Site News
  • Older Articles

  • Newsfeeds

    RSSTMC Articles
    RSSComments
    RSS5 Most Liberal Senators
    RSS5 Most Conservative Senators
    RSS5 Most Liberal Representatives
    RSS5 Most Conservative Representatives

  • Archives

    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • August 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006

Admin


Log in

Copyright © 2012 That's My Congress - Wordpress Theme developed by Web Hosting Fan