capitol hill dome open
That's My Congress
A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.
  • Home
  • Special Topics
  • Contact
  • Card Game

44 From Congress Join Pat Robertson To Push Christianity Through Government

Posted on November 17 2009 by Congress Watcher

44 members of the U.S. Congress (3 senators and 41 representatives) have signed onto a friend of the court legal brief by a pro-theocracy Christian organization founded by televangelist Pat Robertson. The brief urges the court to dismiss a lawsuit by an organization of non-religious Americans. That lawsuit seeks to end the preferential promotion of Christianity at the new Capitol Visitors Center in Washington D.C. through the prominent engraving of pro-Christian slogans “In God We Trust” and “One Nation Under God” in the walls of the Center.

pat robertsonThe legal briefing makes little sense, managing to unravel its own argument almost from the start, claiming of the slogans that “These expressions simply echo the sentiments found in the Declaration of Independence and recognize the undeniable truth that our freedoms come from a source higher than the state. These sentiments were adopted for the express purpose of reaffirming America’s unique understanding of this truth.”

Of course, the Declaration of Independence is not a founding legal document. It is merely a composition intended to publicize the positions of the Continental Congress before any legal framework for the independent American states had been formed – indeed, long before actual independent sovereignty had been achieved.

The obvious contradiction in the brief filed by Pat Robertson’s organization is that the group defends the slogans as representations of a particular religious faith, which the 44 signing members of Congress, all Christians, recognize as “undeniable truth”, but which is quite clearly denied by the group of non-religious Americans filing suit.

The brief claims that the posting of Christian slogans on an official government building paid for by Congress is justified because of some kind of “unique” religious status of the United States of America. Yet, the highest law of the land, the Constitution of the United States of America, recognizes no religious identity for the nation, and mentions no religious rationale for the founding of the nation. On the contrary, the Constitution requires that there be no religious test for any public office, and in the very first clause of the very first amendment, forbids any establishment of religion through Congress.

The engraving of particularly Christian slogans on the Capitol Visitors Center obviously violates both the spirit and the letter of the first amendment. The 44 members of Congress who signed Pat Robertson’s legal brief ought to remember that they have sworn to uphold the Constitution, not to promote one religious group to the detriment of everybody else.

Tags: capitol visitors center, christianity, constitution, first amendment, pat robertson, religion, separation of church and state, theocracy

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Transcript: Gregory T. Nojeim Testimony on Cybersecurity and Privacy to the Senate Judiciary Committee
Dana Rohrabacher Stands Against Afghan War Escalation
  • red congress banner
  • Recent Comments

    • R. C. Jackman on Roll Call: 88 Tea Party members of Congress vote for Unrestrained War Powers
    • Richard Page on Jones and Cleaver Try To Convert Churches Into Political Tools
    • Viv Szabo on Status of the Equal Rights Amendment
    • James on Fact Check: Do 70 Members of Congress Belong to Socialist Party of America Caucus?
  • RSS Legislative News

    • Barack Obama Supports Big Brother Spying Powers Against Americans. Do You?
    • 5 Year Extension Of Warrantless Surveillance On Americans Advanced By Secret Senate Hearing
    • Beloved Defender of the Constitution Ron Paul Just Voted Against the Constitution Again
    • New Sanctions Against Iran Smelling Very Oily
    • 77 Democrats Sacrifice Medicare To Protect Military Spending
    • Dozen Democrats Join House GOP To Demolish Nuclear Nonproliferation
  • Legislative Scorecards

    112th Congress of 2011-2012:

    Senate Scorecard

    House Scorecard



    Historical Records
    111th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    110th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    109th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate

  • This Week In Congress Newsletter

    Receive our This Week in Congress Newsletter by e-mail:



    Our Privacy Commitment: We will not sell or give your e-mail address to any other person or company. We will only send you our This Week in Congress Newsletter, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Recent Posts

    • Congress Preparing To Extend Electronic Spy Dragnet For Five More Years
    • Arkansas Liberals Find An Alternative To Blue Dog Democrats
    • Does Super PAC Pay Aguilar Family Member’s Salary on Ground Campaign?
    • Connie Mack Lunches With A Lobbyist
    • 79 House Democrats Vote To Keep Afghanistan War Going On Even Longer
    • Silly Season And Serious Season In The U.S. House
    • Michael Grimm Taking Money In Private Cigar Club Tonight
    • Terrorists and Heart Disease: Who in Congress Focuses on the Real Harm?
  • Search For Legislation

     

     
  • Tags

    afghanistan barack obama blue dogs california campaign finance christianity climate change congress constitution cosponsorship deepwater horizon democrats dennis kucinich economy energy environment equality fisa amendments act florida global warming Green Party gulf of mexico health care house house of representatives lgbt lobbyists marriage military new york obama offshore drilling oil oil spill patriot act pollution religion republicans senate separation of church and state spending spying surveillance taxes war
  • Categories

    • Activism
    • All Articles
    • campaign gear
    • caucuses
    • Ethics
    • Events
    • Featured
    • House campaigns
    • House hearings
    • House legislation
    • Ideas
    • Links
    • Personalities
    • Podcasts
    • Power Plays
    • questions
    • Senate campaigns
    • Senate hearings
    • Senate legislation
    • Site News
  • Older Articles

  • Newsfeeds

    RSSTMC Articles
    RSSComments
    RSS5 Most Liberal Senators
    RSS5 Most Conservative Senators
    RSS5 Most Liberal Representatives
    RSS5 Most Conservative Representatives

  • Archives

    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • August 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006

Admin


Log in

Copyright © 2012 That's My Congress - Wordpress Theme developed by Web Hosting Fan