capitol hill dome open
That's My Congress
A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.
  • Home
  • Special Topics
  • Contact
  • Card Game

Steve Stivers and the Lie About Mary Jo Kilroy to be Kept Quiet

Posted on November 10 2009 by Congressional Aid

“What’s more, Kilroy voted to allow your tax dollars to fund abortions.” — Steve Stivers, e-mail statement distributed November 9, 2009.

Steve Stivers of Ohio, running for Congress against Mary Jo KilroySteve Stivers, challenging Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy in Ohio’s 15th District next year, made this declaration yesterday in regards to H.R. 3962 and the Stupak Amendment to it. The Stupak Amendment, which passed despite Mary Jo Kilroy’s vote against it, made it illegal for any private health care plan to cover abortion if just one person enrolled in the plan obtains a federal subsidy to help pay for the premiums. Under the Stupak Amendment, even if a woman pays all the costs of such a plan completely on her own out of her own pocket, the plan cannot provide insurance coverage for abortions.

Steve Stivers’ declaration is a lie because Mary Jo Kilroy did not vote against taking away tax dollars for abortion funding. She voted against something more draconian than that: an anti-free-market measure that forbids private insurance plans from covering abortion even when women pay for that private insurance themselves. If Steve Stivers is for such a measure, he will have difficulty depicting himself as a man in favor of freeing business from the fetters of government.

But Steve Stivers’ declaration is a lie for a more fundamental reason than that. Even in voting against the Stupak Amendment, Mary Jo Kilroy did not vote “to allow your tax dollars to fund abortions.” Under the unamended text of H.R. 3962, federal tax dollars are clearly prohibited from being used for abortion, with exceptions in cases of rape, incest, and danger to the life of the woman (the same exceptions as in the Stupak amendment). H.R. 3962, even unamended, would have set in stone these provisions of the Hyde Amendment, a measure that until now the Congress has had to reauthorize every year, with some controversy.

Steve Stivers is lying about Mary Jo Kilroy because in her support for H.R. 3962 before the vote, in her vote against the Stupak Amendment, and then in her vote for H.R. 3962 after the Stupak Amendment passed, Mary Jo Kilroy acted in support of the Hyde Amendment. Mary Jo Kilroy voted in favor of prohibiting federal tax dollars from being used to fund abortions.

You won’t hear the Kilroy campaign trumpeting about Stivers’ lie, however, just as you won’t hear congressional Democrats who call themselves pro-choice speaking loudly about the support they gave to H.R. 3962′s provision to cement the ban on federal funding for abortions. After all these years harrumphing about the Hyde Amendment, congressional Democrats went ahead and gave it their support. This is an issue about which Democrats would rather their pro-choice constituents didn’t hear. This is a lie by Steve Stivers that Mary Jo Kilroy might prefer were kept quiet.

Tags: abortion, Bart Stupak, funding, h.r. 3962, hyde amendment, mary jo kilroy, ohio, pro-choice, steve stivers

2 Responses to “Steve Stivers and the Lie About Mary Jo Kilroy to be Kept Quiet”

  1. Tam Ubach says:
    November 12, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    Thanks to Mary Jo Kilroy for standing for those that she represents and not just for her own opinions and party. Silly me, I thought that is what senators and representatives were supposed to do. oh AND not listening or taking “bribes” from lobbyists. Let’s see the word “representative” that sort of indicates representing…such as representing those they represent. What a GREAT concept. So, when you go to Washington, it is not all about YOU, but the entire state that you go there to represent. The people of the United States want and need a public health option end of story.

  2. David Ryon says:
    September 9, 2010 at 6:03 am

    The Ohio Right to Life put politics over principles. Their only saving grace is giving Stivers a preferred status. Stivers did not receive the Ohio Right to Life endorsement. A preferred status is not the same as an endorsement. I am pro-life from conception until natural death. Steve Stivers is pro-choice.

    Rob Portman received 50% more votes than Stivers in the 15th congressional district. It is obvious republicans are not happy with Stivers. John Adams took over 8000 votes and Ralph Applegate took almost 2000 votes in the primary.

    A vote for Stivers is a vote for Kilroy; Don’t waste a constitutional conservative vote on Stivers.

    Cast your Constitutional Conservative vote for a constitutional conservative. Vote for David Ryon.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Mark Souder Opposes Excess Homeland Security
Mary Fallin Falacious Federal Fiscal Fit Was Funded
  • red congress banner
  • Recent Comments

    • R. C. Jackman on Roll Call: 88 Tea Party members of Congress vote for Unrestrained War Powers
    • Richard Page on Jones and Cleaver Try To Convert Churches Into Political Tools
    • Viv Szabo on Status of the Equal Rights Amendment
    • James on Fact Check: Do 70 Members of Congress Belong to Socialist Party of America Caucus?
  • RSS Legislative News

    • Barack Obama Supports Big Brother Spying Powers Against Americans. Do You?
    • 5 Year Extension Of Warrantless Surveillance On Americans Advanced By Secret Senate Hearing
    • Beloved Defender of the Constitution Ron Paul Just Voted Against the Constitution Again
    • New Sanctions Against Iran Smelling Very Oily
    • 77 Democrats Sacrifice Medicare To Protect Military Spending
    • Dozen Democrats Join House GOP To Demolish Nuclear Nonproliferation
  • Legislative Scorecards

    112th Congress of 2011-2012:

    Senate Scorecard

    House Scorecard



    Historical Records
    111th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    110th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    109th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate

  • This Week In Congress Newsletter

    Receive our This Week in Congress Newsletter by e-mail:



    Our Privacy Commitment: We will not sell or give your e-mail address to any other person or company. We will only send you our This Week in Congress Newsletter, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Recent Posts

    • Congress Preparing To Extend Electronic Spy Dragnet For Five More Years
    • Arkansas Liberals Find An Alternative To Blue Dog Democrats
    • Does Super PAC Pay Aguilar Family Member’s Salary on Ground Campaign?
    • Connie Mack Lunches With A Lobbyist
    • 79 House Democrats Vote To Keep Afghanistan War Going On Even Longer
    • Silly Season And Serious Season In The U.S. House
    • Michael Grimm Taking Money In Private Cigar Club Tonight
    • Terrorists and Heart Disease: Who in Congress Focuses on the Real Harm?
  • Search For Legislation

     

     
  • Tags

    afghanistan barack obama blue dogs california campaign finance christianity climate change congress constitution cosponsorship deepwater horizon democrats dennis kucinich economy energy environment equality fisa amendments act florida global warming Green Party gulf of mexico health care house house of representatives lgbt lobbyists marriage military new york obama offshore drilling oil oil spill patriot act pollution religion republicans senate separation of church and state spending spying surveillance taxes war
  • Categories

    • Activism
    • All Articles
    • campaign gear
    • caucuses
    • Ethics
    • Events
    • Featured
    • House campaigns
    • House hearings
    • House legislation
    • Ideas
    • Links
    • Personalities
    • Podcasts
    • Power Plays
    • questions
    • Senate campaigns
    • Senate hearings
    • Senate legislation
    • Site News
  • Older Articles

  • Newsfeeds

    RSSTMC Articles
    RSSComments
    RSS5 Most Liberal Senators
    RSS5 Most Conservative Senators
    RSS5 Most Liberal Representatives
    RSS5 Most Conservative Representatives

  • Archives

    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • August 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006

Admin


Log in

Copyright © 2012 That's My Congress - Wordpress Theme developed by Web Hosting Fan