capitol hill dome open
That's My Congress
A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.
  • Home
  • Special Topics
  • Contact
  • Card Game

Jim Bunning’s Good Idea: 72 Hour Transparency Act for Bills

Posted on October 9 2009 by Congressional Aid

Senator Jim Bunning is not known for supporting government transparency and accountability. Failing to support government openness about its surveillance activities, Bunning regularly votes instead in favor of government-supported discrimination.

Senator Jim Bunning of Kentucky, Announcing Introduction of S. 1772But this week Senator Bunning has come out with a good idea that has the potential to enhance citizens’ awareness of what’s going on in their government. S. 1772 is a bill that would require the text of legislation to be publicly available for 72 hours before it is acted upon. This would provide a three day period in which citizens could read and react to all proposals. No longer could controversial provisions be sneaked into bills before the public had a chance to know.

Transparency isn’t helpful to ordinary citizens alone. Inside the Senate itself, the practice of pushing through legislative changes too quickly for rank-and-file Senators to reasonably react would also be brought to an end by this bill. S. 1772 would thereby democratize the Senate, preventing episodes of public embarrassment like that endured yesterday by Senator Amy Klobuchar. Klobuchar chirpily assured her colleagues on the Senate Judiciary Committee that they didn’t need to pass the Durbin Amendment to S. 1692 because reasonable text was already in that bill. Then Klobuchar picked up the Durbin Amendment, read the text of it, praised it, and reiterated that she would vote against it. How could Senator Klobuchar be so unfamiliar with the Durbin Amendment that she opposed? A lack of diligence on her part explains some of the problem, but there’s a structural source of her ignorance as well: Amy Klobuchar didn’t have three days to review the Amendment and get it straight in her head.

Senator Bunning inserts reasonable caveats into his legislation: in the case of true emergencies, a 2/3 vote of the Senate or committee considering legislation can waive the 72 hour requirement. No classified information contained in bills will have to be made public, either. For the vast majority of legislation that doesn’t deal with classified material and isn’t passed on a true emergency basis, Bunning’s bill reasonably requires that the public have a chance to see what’s headed down its throat.

Thanks are due to Senator Jim Bunning for taking the public’s blindfold off. It’s perhaps ironic that the full text of S. 1772 isn’t yet available for the public to read via the official Congressional database called Thomas. Fortunately, Jim Bunning has made the full text available here.

Tags: amy klobuchar, cbo, congressional budget office, internet, Jim Bunning, kentucky, ky, rules, s. 1772, senate, transparency

One Response to “Jim Bunning’s Good Idea: 72 Hour Transparency Act for Bills”

  1. Congressional Aid says:
    October 12, 2009 at 11:41 pm

    Update: Not a soul has cosponsored Senator Bunning’s bill.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Patrick Leahy Blocks Reforms Of The FISA Amendments Act
Amy Klobuchar: Dazed, Confused and Compliant on the Judiciary Committee
  • red congress banner
  • Recent Comments

    • R. C. Jackman on Roll Call: 88 Tea Party members of Congress vote for Unrestrained War Powers
    • Richard Page on Jones and Cleaver Try To Convert Churches Into Political Tools
    • Viv Szabo on Status of the Equal Rights Amendment
    • James on Fact Check: Do 70 Members of Congress Belong to Socialist Party of America Caucus?
  • RSS Legislative News

    • Barack Obama Supports Big Brother Spying Powers Against Americans. Do You?
    • 5 Year Extension Of Warrantless Surveillance On Americans Advanced By Secret Senate Hearing
    • Beloved Defender of the Constitution Ron Paul Just Voted Against the Constitution Again
    • New Sanctions Against Iran Smelling Very Oily
    • 77 Democrats Sacrifice Medicare To Protect Military Spending
    • Dozen Democrats Join House GOP To Demolish Nuclear Nonproliferation
  • Legislative Scorecards

    112th Congress of 2011-2012:

    Senate Scorecard

    House Scorecard



    Historical Records
    111th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    110th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    109th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate

  • This Week In Congress Newsletter

    Receive our This Week in Congress Newsletter by e-mail:



    Our Privacy Commitment: We will not sell or give your e-mail address to any other person or company. We will only send you our This Week in Congress Newsletter, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Recent Posts

    • Congress Preparing To Extend Electronic Spy Dragnet For Five More Years
    • Arkansas Liberals Find An Alternative To Blue Dog Democrats
    • Does Super PAC Pay Aguilar Family Member’s Salary on Ground Campaign?
    • Connie Mack Lunches With A Lobbyist
    • 79 House Democrats Vote To Keep Afghanistan War Going On Even Longer
    • Silly Season And Serious Season In The U.S. House
    • Michael Grimm Taking Money In Private Cigar Club Tonight
    • Terrorists and Heart Disease: Who in Congress Focuses on the Real Harm?
  • Search For Legislation

     

     
  • Tags

    afghanistan barack obama blue dogs california campaign finance christianity climate change congress constitution cosponsorship deepwater horizon democrats dennis kucinich economy energy environment equality fisa amendments act florida global warming Green Party gulf of mexico health care house house of representatives lgbt lobbyists marriage military new york obama offshore drilling oil oil spill patriot act pollution religion republicans senate separation of church and state spending spying surveillance taxes war
  • Categories

    • Activism
    • All Articles
    • campaign gear
    • caucuses
    • Ethics
    • Events
    • Featured
    • House campaigns
    • House hearings
    • House legislation
    • Ideas
    • Links
    • Personalities
    • Podcasts
    • Power Plays
    • questions
    • Senate campaigns
    • Senate hearings
    • Senate legislation
    • Site News
  • Older Articles

  • Newsfeeds

    RSSTMC Articles
    RSSComments
    RSS5 Most Liberal Senators
    RSS5 Most Conservative Senators
    RSS5 Most Liberal Representatives
    RSS5 Most Conservative Representatives

  • Archives

    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • August 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006

Admin


Log in

Copyright © 2012 That's My Congress - Wordpress Theme developed by Web Hosting Fan