Al Franken Votes to Let Big Brother Spy on Innocent Americans

Al Franken, declaring with an annoyed NO his opposition to civil liberties.  Why does Al Franken hate the Constitution?In the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Richard Durbin just offered an amendment to S. 1692, a bill reauthorizing Patriot Act surveillance powers. It would have only required that when national security letters (NSLs) are issued without constitutional warrants, they have to be limited to surveillance of those who are suspected terrorists, suspected spies, or people connected to suspected terrorists or spies. The Durbin Amendment, in short, would restrict the use of Patriot Act to its original stated purpose: combating terrorists.

Al Franken, with a visibly annoyed and loud “NO,” just used his seat on the Senate Judiciary Committee to vote AGAINST the Durbin Amendment.

Let that sink in for a moment.

Al Franken, who used to ridicule George W. Bush and the Patriot Act from behind his microphone at Air America radio, cast a vote to let the government continue to use the Patriot Act to spy on innocent Americans without warrants, even when they aren’t suspected terrorists, even when they aren’t suspected spies, even when they have no connection at all to anybody who is a suspected terrorist or spy.

Al Franken: Big Brother’s big brother. Is that what you voted for, Minnesota?

3 Comments

on “Al Franken Votes to Let Big Brother Spy on Innocent Americans
3 Comments on “Al Franken Votes to Let Big Brother Spy on Innocent Americans
  1. I for one am all for the rewritting of the Patriot Act. I think Senator Richard Dubin is right. Lets keep the Big Brother act out of the general publics private lives. Warrents are still good even for when some people are questionable. Keeps every one straight.
    Al Franken needs to make up his mind which way the wind blows.

  2. Pingback: In a Small Minority, Harness the Power of Honest Embarrassment

  3. I don’t understand why we have to have a revoteor an amendment on something that is already law but was just ignored during the Bush administration. Perhaps that is what Franken’s objective is/was. Perhaps he is saying that we should not have to amend a law that was OK with the judge’s permission in its original form??? We need a little more enlightenmnet from That’s My Congress!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>