capitol hill dome open
That's My Congress
A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.
  • Home
  • Special Topics
  • Contact
  • Card Game

Military Spending for the Sake of Military Spending

Posted on June 12 2009 by Congress Watcher

U.S. Representative Trent Franks has been called the most kooky member of Congress. Franks has earned a reputation for supporting the most extreme bits of legislation, while ignoring or opposing proposed laws that deal with the everyday concerns of most Americans.

trent franksThis year, Congressman Franks has come up with a real doozy: H.J. Res. 23. This resolution would state, as U.S. government policy that the military budget should always be more than 4 percent of the gross domestic product.

Why? Why does Trent Franks think that the military budget should always be this high? Has he calculated that this amount is what’s needed to confront a particular threat? Is there some particular need that this resolution addresses?

Nope. H.J. Res. 23 merely proposes spending for the sake of spending. Instead of considering a military budget that actually matches real needs, Trent Franks just wants to throw a bunch of money at the Pentagon… and at the corporations that profit from military contracts.

Most ridiculous of all, the resolution proposed by Trent Franks doesn’t even have the power to change anything. As a resolution, and not a bill to actually create law, H.J. Res. 23 is nothing more than a toothless policy statement. If Representative Franks really believes in requiring huge amounts of military spending just for the sake of using up lots of money, why didn’t he actually create a law to enact his extravagant budgetary goals?

With H.J. Res. 23, Trent Franks manages to take an extremist pose without actually getting anything done. Once more, we see that the Franks agenda is made up of a bizarre mix of radicalism and ineffectiveness. If we weren’t in the middle of an economic crisis, these kinds of antics would be entertaining. However, times are hard, and the 2nd congressional district of Arizona deserves better than to be represented by a politician who is unable to get anything done for them in Washington D.C., because of his ideological antics.

Tags: budget, economy, military, pentagon, spending, Trent Franks, waste

3 Responses to “Military Spending for the Sake of Military Spending”

  1. Carla says:
    June 12, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    Absolutely nutty. Trent Franks is an absolute nut!

  2. Mary says:
    September 30, 2009 at 11:13 am

    I would like to see Trent Franks removed from office. It is a joke that he represents us in District 2 or that he represents the state of Arizona. He continues to embarrass us in the decisions he makes and how he votes in the House.

  3. George says:
    February 6, 2010 at 12:04 pm

    Yep, the man’s wacky. Unfortunately, I live in his district. Because of the way the district has been drawn up by the Republican state legislature, it is vertically impossible to get this nut out. If anyone out there has any incriminating information on him, please email me.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

DeMint Tries to Make it Legal to Fire Workers for Organizing Unions
Congress Failing To Stop Satellite Spying Against Americans
  • red congress banner
  • Recent Comments

    • R. C. Jackman on Roll Call: 88 Tea Party members of Congress vote for Unrestrained War Powers
    • Richard Page on Jones and Cleaver Try To Convert Churches Into Political Tools
    • Viv Szabo on Status of the Equal Rights Amendment
    • James on Fact Check: Do 70 Members of Congress Belong to Socialist Party of America Caucus?
  • RSS Legislative News

    • Barack Obama Supports Big Brother Spying Powers Against Americans. Do You?
    • 5 Year Extension Of Warrantless Surveillance On Americans Advanced By Secret Senate Hearing
    • Beloved Defender of the Constitution Ron Paul Just Voted Against the Constitution Again
    • New Sanctions Against Iran Smelling Very Oily
    • 77 Democrats Sacrifice Medicare To Protect Military Spending
    • Dozen Democrats Join House GOP To Demolish Nuclear Nonproliferation
  • Legislative Scorecards

    112th Congress of 2011-2012:

    Senate Scorecard

    House Scorecard



    Historical Records
    111th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    110th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    109th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate

  • This Week In Congress Newsletter

    Receive our This Week in Congress Newsletter by e-mail:



    Our Privacy Commitment: We will not sell or give your e-mail address to any other person or company. We will only send you our This Week in Congress Newsletter, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Recent Posts

    • Congress Preparing To Extend Electronic Spy Dragnet For Five More Years
    • Arkansas Liberals Find An Alternative To Blue Dog Democrats
    • Does Super PAC Pay Aguilar Family Member’s Salary on Ground Campaign?
    • Connie Mack Lunches With A Lobbyist
    • 79 House Democrats Vote To Keep Afghanistan War Going On Even Longer
    • Silly Season And Serious Season In The U.S. House
    • Michael Grimm Taking Money In Private Cigar Club Tonight
    • Terrorists and Heart Disease: Who in Congress Focuses on the Real Harm?
  • Search For Legislation

     

     
  • Tags

    afghanistan barack obama blue dogs california campaign finance christianity climate change congress constitution cosponsorship deepwater horizon democrats dennis kucinich economy energy environment equality fisa amendments act florida global warming Green Party gulf of mexico health care house house of representatives lgbt lobbyists marriage military new york obama offshore drilling oil oil spill patriot act pollution religion republicans senate separation of church and state spending spying surveillance taxes war
  • Categories

    • Activism
    • All Articles
    • campaign gear
    • caucuses
    • Ethics
    • Events
    • Featured
    • House campaigns
    • House hearings
    • House legislation
    • Ideas
    • Links
    • Personalities
    • Podcasts
    • Power Plays
    • questions
    • Senate campaigns
    • Senate hearings
    • Senate legislation
    • Site News
  • Older Articles

  • Newsfeeds

    RSSTMC Articles
    RSSComments
    RSS5 Most Liberal Senators
    RSS5 Most Conservative Senators
    RSS5 Most Liberal Representatives
    RSS5 Most Conservative Representatives

  • Archives

    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • August 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006

Admin


Log in

Copyright © 2012 That's My Congress - Wordpress Theme developed by Web Hosting Fan