capitol hill dome open
That's My Congress
A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.
  • Home
  • Special Topics
  • Contact
  • Card Game

How Progressive is the Congressional Progressive Caucus? (March 2009)

Posted on March 12 2009 by Congressional Aid

Since its founding in 1991, the Congressional Progressive Caucus in the House of Representatives has been characterized as the most doctrinaire of groups, marching in a unified lockstep. Right-wing authors refer to the Progressive Caucus as “revolutionary,” “fringe left,” “socialist,” “anti-American,” “communist”, and even:

Congress’ very own Red Army. They are card-carrying members of the so-called ‘Progressive Caucus,’ marching the nation inevitably toward its self-proclaimed socialist ideal…. people who know what they believe, know what they want and fight for it relentlessly….

Next time you wonder why our nation is tumbling down the slippery slope toward socialism, dictatorship and repression, don’t forget the active role played by this group of dedicated, professional malcontents… in this battle for the long haul. They never give up.

Writers on the left use congratulatory adjectives rather than pejoratives, but they also portray the Congressional Progressive Caucus as a group that is “in gear” and loyal to the cause.

Congressional Progressive Caucus City DoveIs this image of the Progressive Caucus as an organized, active group with unity of purpose and relentless activity based in observable reality? Is this image just wishful thinking on the part of progressives looking for advocates in Washington, DC, or on the part of right-wing pundits trying to motivate its own partisans with the story of a massively powerful collective supervillain?

In a move toward answering this question, we could just take the caucus’ own word for it: in the preamble to their articulation of principles, the caucus declares “our unwavering commitment to these legislative priorities and we will not rest until they become law.” But what kind of observable commitment has the caucus shown? Even when it comes to talk, consider that year after year after year after year during the Bush administration, the Congressional Progressive Caucus failed to engage in any observable public activity or communication; it was not until this year that the CPC began to issue regular press releases and member statements.

Moving from talk to legislative action, what have members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus done? How are the 72 full members of the CPC in the 111th Congress (not counting Senator Bernie Sanders or three nonvoting delegates) faring in their support of progressive legislation? Let’s start with two examples: the FISA Amendments Act regarding 4th Amendment civil liberties and the Military Commissions Act regarding the rights to habeas corpus and a fair trial.

Military Commissions Act
In 2007, J. Clifford noted that only 30% of the Progressive Caucus had signed on in support of a bill to repeal the Military Commissions Act. In this year’s 111th Congress, as of March 12, only 11 out of the 72 voting House members of the CPC have added their support to H.R. 591, a bill introduced by non-CPC-member David Price to repeal the MCA. That’s 15% support, less than in the 110th Congress. As of now, no member of the CPC has authored any similar bill to repeal the MCA, and one other bill to repeal the MCA, H.R. 1315, is authored by non-member Adam Schiff and cosponsored by no members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. This is not evidence for lock-step commitment to the progressive cause. Indeed, there are non-members with a higher level of activity on the Military Commissions Act than members.

FISA Amendments Act
In October of 2007, the Congressional Progressive Caucus issued a written statement in opposition to the erosion of 4th Amendment Rights represented by the Protect America Act, and on February 19 of this year the CPC featured a document by member Barbara Lee that criticizes the FISA Amendments Act and declares outright (page 36) that “In 2009, Congressmembers can repeal the FISA Amendments Act of 2008.”

As of today in the 111th Congress of 2009, the following are the members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus who have written or cosponsored legislation to repeal the FISA Amendments Act:

That empty space you see is not a typographical error. As of today, not once piece of legislation has been introduced before the 111th Congress to repeal or even reform the FISA Amendments Act. Of course, this means that no member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus has supported these nonexistent bills.

Reality on FISA reform doesn’t match the reputation of a relentless CPC that just won’t stop in the promotion of the progressive agenda. The CPC has talked for three years about this subject, but practically speaking it is inactive.

Alignment with a Progressive Slate: No Perfection and a Lot of Variation
Let’s shift focus in our evaluation from particular legislative issues to the broad progressive agenda. Without reference to what members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus are doing, we at That’s My Congress have developed an index called the Progressive Action Score. It is a 0-100 score for each Representative that is equal to the % of our slate of progressive legislative actions — both votes and cosponsorships — that a member of the House of Representatives has engaged in. The higher the score, the more closely a Representative follows the path of progressivism in the Congress. A score of 100 would indicate a perfect match.

The following is a list of Progressive Action Scores as of today for all Representatives in the Congressional Progressive Caucus:

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY, District 15). In-district phone: 212-663-3900. Progressive Action Score: 14/100
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA, District 35). In-district phone: 323-757-8900. Progressive Action Score: 21/100
Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY, District 28). In-district phone: 716-282-1274. Progressive Action Score: 21/100
Rep. Ben Lujan (D-NM, District 3). In-district phone: 505-984-8950. Progressive Action Score: 21/100
Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL, District 8). In-district phone: 407-841-1757. Progressive Action Score: 21/100
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS, District 2). In-district phone: 800-355-9003. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Jose Serrano (D-NY, District 16). In-district phone: 718-620-0084. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Bobby Rush (D-IL, District 1). In-district phone: 773-224-6500. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Laura Richardson (D-CA, District 37). In-district phone: 562-436-3828. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI, District 4). In-district phone: 414-297-1140. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. David Loebsack (D-IA, District 2). In-district phone: 319-351-0789. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Carolyn Kilpatrick (D-MI, District 13). In-district phone: 734-246-0780. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH, District 9). In-district phone: 419-259-7500. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Eddie Johnson (D-TX, District 30). In-district phone: 214-922-8885. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Jesse Jackson (D-IL, District 2). In-district phone: 708-798-6000. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Phil Hare (D-IL, District 17). In-district phone: 309-793-5760. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-OH, District 11). In-district phone: 216-522-4900. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Donna Edwards (D-MD, District 4). In-district phone: 301-562-7960. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO, District 5). In-district phone: 816-842-4545. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Andre Carson (D-IN, District 7). In-district phone: 317-283-6516. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Corrine Brown (D-FL, District 3). In-district phone: 407-872-0656. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA, District 31). In-district phone: 213-483-1425. Progressive Action Score: 29/100
Rep. Diane Watson (D-CA, District 33). In-district phone: 323-965-1422. Progressive Action Score: 33/100
Rep. John Hall (D-NY, District 19). In-district phone: 845-225-3641. Progressive Action Score: 33/100
Rep. Melvin Watt (D-NC, District 12). In-district phone: 336-275-9950. Progressive Action Score: 36/100
Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D-NY, District 12). In-district phone: 212-673-3997. Progressive Action Score: 36/100
Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA, District 34). In-district phone: 213-628-9230. Progressive Action Score: 36/100
Rep. Ed Pastor (D-AZ, District 4). In-district phone: 602-256-0551. Progressive Action Score: 36/100
Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY, District 8). In-district phone: 718-373-3198. Progressive Action Score: 36/100
Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA, District 7). In-district phone: 206-553-7170. Progressive Action Score: 36/100
Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL, District 4). In-district phone: 773-342-0774. Progressive Action Score: 36/100
Rep. Robert Brady (D-PA, District 1). In-district phone: 610-874-7094. Progressive Action Score: 36/100
Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT, District 0). In-district phone: 888-605-7270. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA, District 30). In-district phone: 323-651-1040. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. John Tierney (D-MA, District 6). In-district phone: 781-595-7375. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA, District 13). In-district phone: 510-494-1388. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA, District 39). In-district phone: 562-860-5050. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Donald Payne (D-NJ, District 10). In-district phone: 973-645-3213. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. George Miller (D-CA, District 7). In-district phone: 925-602-1880. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA, District 7). In-district phone: 508-875-2900. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. John Lewis (D-GA, District 5). In-district phone: 404-659-0116. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH, District 10). In-district phone: 216-228-8850. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-PA, District 2). In-district phone: 215-848-9386. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT, District 3). In-district phone: 203-562-3718. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Danny Davis (D-IL, District 7). In-district phone: 773-533-7520. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN, District 9). In-district phone: 901-544-4131. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Lacy Clay (D-MO, District 1). In-district phone: 314-367-1970. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY, District 11). In-district phone: 718-287-1142. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA, District 8). In-district phone: 617-621-6208. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI, District 1). In-district phone: 808-541-2570. Progressive Action Score: 43/100
Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL, District 19). In-district phone: 561-988-6302. Progressive Action Score: 50/100
Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-ME, District 1). In-district phone: 207-774-5019. Progressive Action Score: 50/100
Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA, District 4). In-district phone: 770-939-2016. Progressive Action Score: 50/100
Rep. Sam Farr (D-CA, District 17). In-district phone: 800-340-3277. Progressive Action Score: 50/100
Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR, District 4). In-district phone: 541-440-3523. Progressive Action Score: 50/100
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD, District 7). In-district phone: 410-465-8259. Progressive Action Score: 50/100
Rep. John Conyers (D-MI, District 14). In-district phone: 313-961-5670. Progressive Action Score: 50/100
Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI, District 2). In-district phone: 608-258-9800. Progressive Action Score: 50/100
Rep. John Olver (D-MA, District 1). In-district phone: 413-442-0946. Progressive Action Score: 57/100
Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY, District 14). In-district phone: 718-932-1804. Progressive Action Score: 57/100
Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX, District 18). In-district phone: 713-227-7740. Progressive Action Score: 57/100
Rep. Mazie Hirono (D-HI, District 2). In-district phone: 808-541-1986. Progressive Action Score: 57/100
Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA, District 4). In-district phone: 508-999-6462. Progressive Action Score: 57/100
Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA, District 6). In-district phone: 707-542-7182. Progressive Action Score: 64/100
Rep. Michael Honda (D-CA, District 15). In-district phone: 408-558-8085. Progressive Action Score: 64/100
Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN, District 5). In-district phone: 612-522-1212. Progressive Action Score: 64/100
Rep. James McGovern (D-MA, District 3). In-district phone: 508-460-9292. Progressive Action Score: 71/100
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA, District 9). In-district phone: 510-763-0370. Progressive Action Score: 71/100
Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ, District 7). In-district phone: 520-622-6788. Progressive Action Score: 79/100
Rep. Janice Schakowsky (D-IL, District 9). In-district phone: 847-328-3409. Progressive Action Score: 79/100
Rep. Bob Filner (D-CA, District 51). In-district phone: 619-422-5963. Progressive Action Score: 79/100
Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY, District 22). In-district phone: 607-273-1388. Progressive Action Score: 86/100

Although Rep. Maurice Hinchey comes close, no member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus has a perfect record of progressivism, and there is a wide variation in the degree of support for the progressive slate.

If you find your member of Congress’ name on this list and she or he does not support a progressive slate of policies as strongly as you might hope, click on your member’s name to review his or her legislative record, review the slate of legislation we reference, then make a phone call with informed questions.

If you find yourself inclined to refer to the Progressive Caucus as a lock-step, coordinated, motivated force for progressive change (or demonic possession) in the Congress, please think again.

Tags: caucus, cmo, cohesion, congressional, cosponsorship, fisa amendments act, military commissions act, progressive, progressive caucus, ratings, score, unity

9 Responses to “How Progressive is the Congressional Progressive Caucus? (March 2009)”

  1. Congress’ Progressive Caucus Characterized by Varying Lassitude says:
    March 12, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    [...] and relentless in its pursuit of radical legislation, the reputation doesn’t match reality. A look at the record of the Progressive Caucus shows wide variation among members in the level of support for both particular bills and for a [...]

  2. Political Networks in the Congressional Progressive Caucus, March 2009 says:
    March 13, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    [...] we considered the progressive record of the Congressional Progressive Caucus so far this year on a substantive basis, both in reference to an index of opportunities for [...]

  3. Even the Congressional Progressive Caucus Isn’t That Progressive says:
    September 11, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    [...] in March of this year, articles at Irregular Times and That’s My Congress assessed the progressive record of members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. We were [...]

  4. Michael Bergeron says:
    January 14, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    Dear TMC,

    There are many errors in your CPC numbers in the main list. Both Maxine Waters and Charles Rangel have totally different numbers on their Progressive Scale % between the big list you provide and their individual page that details their voting record. I checked several others and it appears that perhaps the first 2 dozen on the main list are wrong. These major mistakes do not promote high credibility nor professionalism for your organization. I would also like to know the master list of legislative issues and bills that you use for your criteria and why those in particular are chosen.

    As progressives, we need to get our facts exact and purposeful if we are to keep a strong focus on the critical issues of the day. There is no room for error in these serious of times. I look foward to your reply.

    Best,

    Michael

  5. Congressional Aid says:
    January 14, 2010 at 5:50 pm

    Michael,

    Thank you for writing. The two sets of scores are not “wrong” — they’re different. This article, “How Progressive is the Congressional Progressive Caucus?,” was written on March 12, 2009, as the article’s byline notes. The scores in this article reference the behavior of members of Congress as of March 12, 2009. Today is January 14, 2010. Members have engaged in nine months of additional activities, activities that have contributed to changes in their current congressional scores. That’s why they’re different.

  6. Michael Bergeron says:
    January 15, 2010 at 12:46 am

    Thanks for the response. A suggestion for you: it might be good to update the article now that it is nearly a year later. I am also interested in knowing if you have a base line of issues or legislation that you measure all the CPC members. This might be helpful for readers to make an easier comparison. Thanks for your good work and keeping the citizens informed.

    Best,

    Michael

  7. Michael Bergeron says:
    January 15, 2010 at 12:48 am

    Sorry. I just found “the slate of legislation” link.

  8. Congressional Aid says:
    January 15, 2010 at 10:37 am

    That’s a good suggestion, Michael, and we’ll get to that project in the near future.

  9. Congressional Aid says:
    January 16, 2010 at 5:16 pm

    Here you go, Michael: [...] March of 2009, we reviewed the congressional activity of the-members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. The Congressional Progressive Caucus is a [...]

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Congressman Stearns Asks A Good Question
Lynn Jenkins Does A Big Old Nothing For Constituents
  • red congress banner
  • Recent Comments

    • Beverly & Fred Braun on Congress Votes To Drag USA Back To Religious Unity
    • Congressional Aid on Capitol Hill Conference Promises Open Legislative Data. Will it Deliver?
    • Linda on Contact
    • martin on Nationwide Protests Against Arbitrary Imprisonment Powers of The NDAA
  • RSS Legislative News

    • H.R. 3745, Putting All of a Credit Union’s Eggs in the Collection Basket
    • Have You Forgotten Obama’s Broken Promise On Corporate Immunity From Prosecution?
    • Jill Stein and Rocky Anderson Take Different Approaches To Opposing SOPA
    • Barack Obama Approves Law Subjecting Americans To Imprisonment Without Criminal Trial
    • Americans Organizing Recalls Of Senators Who Voted For Imprisonment Without Criminal Trial
    • Which of 3 Caucuses (Tea Party, Constitution, Progressive) Most Opposes Indefinite Detention in the USA?
  • Legislative Scorecards

    112th Congress of 2011-2012:

    Senate Scorecard

    House Scorecard



    Historical Records
    111th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    110th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate
    109th Congress
    ...House
    ...Senate

  • This Week In Congress Newsletter

    Receive our This Week in Congress Newsletter by e-mail:



    Our Privacy Commitment: We will not sell or give your e-mail address to any other person or company. We will only send you our This Week in Congress Newsletter, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Recent Posts

    • In Move to Hold Back the K Street Gravy Train 1 Year, Michael Fitzpatrick Stands Alone
    • Spencer Bachus: Using the Levers of Power to Hurt Poor People, Pulling those Levers to Help Himself
    • Mike Honda Celebrates Ruling Against Prop 8
    • Cecil Bothwell Gains Momentum With Heath Shuler Bowing Out
    • Nationwide Protests Against Arbitrary Imprisonment Powers of The NDAA
    • Capitol Hill Conference Promises Open Legislative Data. Will it Deliver?
    • Peter Stark To Address Reason Rally
    • Will Environmental Issues Tip Florida Democratic Race To Patrick Murphy?
  • Search For Legislation

     

     
  • Tags

    afghanistan barack obama california campaign finance christianity climate change congress constitution cosponsorship deepwater horizon democrats dennis kucinich economy energy environment equality fisa amendments act florida global warming Green Party gulf of mexico health care house house of representatives lgbt lobbyists marriage military new york obama oceans offshore drilling oil oil spill patriot act pollution religion republicans senate separation of church and state spending spying surveillance taxes war
  • Categories

    • Activism
    • All Articles
    • campaign gear
    • caucuses
    • Ethics
    • Events
    • Featured
    • House campaigns
    • House hearings
    • House legislation
    • Ideas
    • Links
    • Personalities
    • Podcasts
    • Power Plays
    • questions
    • Senate campaigns
    • Senate hearings
    • Senate legislation
    • Site News
  • Older Articles

  • Newsfeeds

    RSSTMC Articles
    RSSComments
    RSS5 Most Liberal Senators
    RSS5 Most Conservative Senators
    RSS5 Most Liberal Representatives
    RSS5 Most Conservative Representatives

  • Archives

    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • August 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006

Admin


Log in

Copyright © 2012 That's My Congress - Wordpress Theme developed by Web Hosting Fan