Jay Stevens said,

May 17, 2007 @ 6:47 pm

uh…

I’m not sure if this a Montanan writing this post…? But Montana has the highest percentage of its citizenry in arms right now. That means a lot of Montana families live on military bases, have soldiers oversees, rely on the benefits and privileges that come with military service.

Yanking the funding for Iraq is a great idea…assuming that such a vote would actually spur the president to withdraw our troops. In a more likely scenario, however, Bush in such case would be more likely to raid other parts of the DoD budget to keep fighting. That means cuts in training programs, “nonessential” services like health care, hospitals, schools, etc.

I know Jon, and I know he’s committed to getting us out of Iraq. But I also know he’s very committed to Montana soldiers and their families. It ain’t politics talking, either.

Tester and the majority of Congress already voted for troop withdrawal. Let’s save our energy peppering the Republicans who privately grumble about the war, then turn around and support the President’s veto…