<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What happened to Jon Tester?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2007/05/17/tester-war-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2007/05/17/tester-war-failure/</link>
	<description>A politically independent journal of the campaigns and legislation of the United States Congress.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Stevens</title>
		<link>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2007/05/17/tester-war-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-4710</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 22:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2007/05/17/tester-war-failure/#comment-4710</guid>
		<description>uh...

I&#039;m not sure if this a Montanan writing this post...? But Montana has the highest percentage of its citizenry in arms right now. That means a lot of Montana families live on military bases, have soldiers oversees, rely on the benefits and privileges that come with military service.

Yanking the funding for Iraq is a great idea...assuming that such a vote would actually spur the president to withdraw our troops. In a more likely scenario, however, Bush in such case would be more likely to raid other parts of the DoD budget to keep fighting. That means cuts in training programs, &quot;nonessential&quot; services like health care, hospitals, schools, etc.

I know Jon, and I know he&#039;s committed to getting us out of Iraq. But I also know he&#039;s very committed to Montana soldiers and their families. It ain&#039;t politics talking, either.

Tester and the majority of Congress already voted for troop withdrawal. Let&#039;s save our energy peppering the Republicans who privately grumble about the war, then turn around and support the President&#039;s veto...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if this a Montanan writing this post&#8230;? But Montana has the highest percentage of its citizenry in arms right now. That means a lot of Montana families live on military bases, have soldiers oversees, rely on the benefits and privileges that come with military service.</p>
<p>Yanking the funding for Iraq is a great idea&#8230;assuming that such a vote would actually spur the president to withdraw our troops. In a more likely scenario, however, Bush in such case would be more likely to raid other parts of the DoD budget to keep fighting. That means cuts in training programs, &#8220;nonessential&#8221; services like health care, hospitals, schools, etc.</p>
<p>I know Jon, and I know he&#8217;s committed to getting us out of Iraq. But I also know he&#8217;s very committed to Montana soldiers and their families. It ain&#8217;t politics talking, either.</p>
<p>Tester and the majority of Congress already voted for troop withdrawal. Let&#8217;s save our energy peppering the Republicans who privately grumble about the war, then turn around and support the President&#8217;s veto&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

